A high general IQ, as it is measured today, actually says very little. The tests used for this purpose are hopelessly incomplete. Savants<\/span><\/span> for example, may score extremely high in a specific domain, while scoring low in other areas that fall outside the scope of the test.
It is therefore essential to explore which different forms of intelligence exist side by side and how they interact. Human IQ is thus better understood as an umbrella concept that includes various specific faculties (or capacities) for intelligence, which are either not described at all or only incompletely.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”PULL QUOTE” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” text_font=”Spectral|700|on||||||” text_text_color=”#825945″ text_font_size=”22px” text_orientation=”center” width=”80%” module_alignment=”center” custom_padding=”15px||15px||false|false” border_width_top=”1px” border_color_top=”rgba(130,89,69,0.5)” border_width_bottom=”1px” border_color_bottom=”rgba(130,89,69,0.5)” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
Talents and flourishing are the result
of the interplay of innate faculties<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Tekst quoti\u00ebnten” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_padding=”3%|3%|3%|3%” z_index_tablet=”500″ text_text_shadow_horizontal_length_tablet=”0px” text_text_shadow_vertical_length_tablet=”0px” text_text_shadow_blur_strength_tablet=”1px” link_text_shadow_horizontal_length_tablet=”0px” link_text_shadow_vertical_length_tablet=”0px” link_text_shadow_blur_strength_tablet=”1px” ul_text_shadow_horizontal_length_tablet=”0px” ul_text_shadow_vertical_length_tablet=”0px” ul_text_shadow_blur_strength_tablet=”1px” ol_text_shadow_horizontal_length_tablet=”0px” ol_text_shadow_vertical_length_tablet=”0px” ol_text_shadow_blur_strength_tablet=”1px” quote_text_shadow_horizontal_length_tablet=”0px” quote_text_shadow_vertical_length_tablet=”0px” quote_text_shadow_blur_strength_tablet=”1px” header_text_shadow_horizontal_length_tablet=”0px” header_text_shadow_vertical_length_tablet=”0px” header_text_shadow_blur_strength_tablet=”1px” header_2_text_shadow_horizontal_length_tablet=”0px” header_2_text_shadow_vertical_length_tablet=”0px” header_2_text_shadow_blur_strength_tablet=”1px” header_3_text_shadow_horizontal_length_tablet=”0px” header_3_text_shadow_vertical_length_tablet=”0px” header_3_text_shadow_blur_strength_tablet=”1px” header_4_text_shadow_horizontal_length_tablet=”0px” header_4_text_shadow_vertical_length_tablet=”0px” header_4_text_shadow_blur_strength_tablet=”1px” header_5_text_shadow_horizontal_length_tablet=”0px” header_5_text_shadow_vertical_length_tablet=”0px” header_5_text_shadow_blur_strength_tablet=”1px” header_6_text_shadow_horizontal_length_tablet=”0px” header_6_text_shadow_vertical_length_tablet=”0px” header_6_text_shadow_blur_strength_tablet=”1px” box_shadow_horizontal_tablet=”0px” box_shadow_vertical_tablet=”0px” box_shadow_blur_tablet=”40px” box_shadow_spread_tablet=”0px” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
There is the theory of Howard Gardner\u2019s Multiple Intelligences<\/span><\/span>, which proposes that intelligence is not a single factor, but consists of multiple aspects. However, where Gardner sees intelligence as a toolbox of skills for learning or solving problems in the external world, Selfknowledge Now views intelligence as the interplay of innate, mutually interacting faculties that enable our growth and flourishing. These faculties are rooted in our individuated essence. These are not measurable competencies, but dynamic expressions of consciousness that function in relation to one another. Gardner regarded intelligence as a set of tools available to a person. At Selfknowledge Now<\/em>, however, we do not speak of tools, but of faculties, partly because the spiritual instrumentarium (tools) has already been described under the Organs of the Spirit (Tools of the Spirit)<\/em>. Not only would it be confusing to view intelligence quotients as tools as well, it would also be inaccurate: they are faculties or capacities.<\/p>\n The fundamental difference between the quotient-based classification below and Howard Gardner\u2019s classification of intelligence lies in a different view of the concept of intelligence. So: Gardner describes intelligence as a set of specialized skills\u2014a kind of toolbox of tools one possesses to varying degrees. His model focuses primarily on performance and application in the external world: how well someone can reason, make music, interact socially, or apply spatial insight. The use of the word “skills” also implies that these are developable. Whether that is truly the case is debatable. If we were to replace “developable” with “unveilable,” we wouldn’t approach intelligence as something to be acquired, but as something already present in innate form: potentials waiting to be remembered, recognized, and brought to consciousness. From there, the skills necessary for its expression can be developed. A musical ability, for example, requires motor skills to be expressed, for example, on a musical instrument. But if motor skills are lacking, it will yield little expression, even though music can still be fully “felt and understood.”<\/p>\n Selfknowledge Now<\/em> (Zelfkennis.nu) <\/em>does not regard intelligence as a static collection of skills, but as a dynamic and interactive system of conscious faculties (abilities) that are present at birth. These faculties are part of our innate individualized essence<\/em><\/span><\/span>. The quotient classification below is not intended to measure, but to understand how different faculties can reinforce each other and interactively contribute to a higher level of self-expression and self-realisation. Consciously using and refining the innate presence and functioning is what matters in a human life. It shows the functioning of our mind in relation to the world and to ourselves. An IQ test for this is simply not possible. Life itself is the test.<\/p>\n All Q\u2019s (faculties) are interactive in nature. They exist in inseparable interplay with one another and complement each other, just as the spiritual organs (the spiritual instrumentarium) influence, complement, and support one another. Selfknowledge Now<\/em> (Zelfkennis.nu) <\/em>hereby proposes an entirely new classification of Intelligence Quotients<\/span><\/span>, a classification not used elsewhere in this way. It goes beyond the lists commonly used in psychology. All of these faculties are interactive, provided we possess them to some extent. The interaction between faculty is layered and draws from different sources. This is because we possess two forms of awareness, as described by Michael Polanyi<\/span><\/span>.<\/p>\n The interaction between faculties can occur such that one faculty functions focally, while an underlying faculty intervenes subsidiarily, complementing or deepening the focal function. A dynamic collaboration exists. Some faculties can be actively and consciously directed, while others operate in the background (unconsciously) to support the interaction. For example: in a conversation, we focus on what someone says (focal), while we automatically interpret intonation, body language, and context (subsidiary).<\/p>\n Instead of measuring all sorts of separate categories of observable skills and talents, we should consider a dynamic interplay in which each form of intelligence can support and enrich the others. A holistic whole of mental, emotional, and motor faculties along with attention-related aspects. This provides a far more complete picture of what we are capable of as human beings and what possibilities we have in the development of our consciousness. The dynamic between focal<\/em> and subsidiary<\/em> awareness deepens the interaction between the various capacities (quotients). It builds bridges between learned skills (such as language or logic) and more intuitive faculties (such as empathy or creativity). This creates an extra dimension in the complexity of human consciousness and a more complete model of quotients.<\/p>\n There are widely accepted concepts that align with this: crystallized intelligence<\/em> and fluid intelligence<\/em>.<\/p>\n The interaction between intelligence faculties can also be described as a form of bisociation<\/span><\/span>, which can yield new, surprising, or deeper insights. Bisociation is the process of consciousness in which different or seemingly unrelated ideas come together and are combined, creating something new or unexpected. Various (intellectual) faculties of consciousness then work together and reinforce one another unnoticed. It is precisely these cross-links between faculties that enable us to generate truly new insights and give this quotient model its richness and depth.<\/p>\n [\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text admin_label=”Tekst met kader 1″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ background_color=”#faeede” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”|20px||20px” custom_padding=”3%|3%|3%|3%” border_width_all=”3px” border_color_all=”#dcb385″ use_border_color=”on” saved_tabs=”advanced,css” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n A musician focuses their focal<\/em> awareness on the melody, rhythm, and musical structure of their improvisation. They may consciously concentrate on timing, tone, and flow. This is the focal<\/em> operation of the Musical Quotient (MQ).<\/span> At the same time, something else flows beneath the surface: an intuitive knowing (NQ), in which harmony and pitch are felt naturally, without the musician being consciously aware of it. It is not intellectual, but an inner hearing that knows what fits. Intuitively, it is \u2018known\u2019 which tones and sequences match well, without consciously choosing them. This is a subsidiary<\/em> process, where the NQ (intuition) acts as a quiet guiding force from within, steering the musical line without being consciously focused on. It happens by itSelf. Because this subsidiary<\/em> layer works through the improvisation, it has a beneficial influence on the emotional\/feeling aspect (EQ).<\/span>
The interrelation of these faculties, and how they can reinforce one another, is of fundamental importance. Intelligence is not a collection of separate \u2018competencies\u2019, but a holistic interplay of mental, emotional and attention-related faculties. This approach is not based on neurological or psychological studies, but on broader spiritual-philosophical insights. You cannot therefore score on it.
An upbringing in which these faculties are recognised and stimulated ensures that they can influence our growth from an early age, and help shape our thinking, speaking and acting. Lacking such an education, they can become obscured \u2013 just as other qualities of our individual essence can remain unnoticed or suppressed when education is inadequate.<\/p>\nInteractive<\/h3>\n
The depth of these faculties, the harmony between them, and the way they reinforce each other\u2014even when these processes are not explicit or visible\u2014largely determine a person\u2019s overall intelligence (the IQ).<\/p>\n
All faculties are innate and therefore cannot be “enhanced.” However, they can be discovered, purified, and brought to optimal functioning, just like our Centers and Organs of the Spirit. Self-reflection and self-study are necessary for this.<\/p>\nOur IQ is the umbrella of mental capacities under which the following Q’s fall:<\/h4>\n
\n
The faculty for intellectual\/cognitive understanding: logical and analytical thinking and structuring. This enables us to recognize patterns, classify, and make connections between facts.<\/li>\n
The faculty to perceive, understand, and healthily deal with emotions in oneself and others. This includes empathy, emotional regulation, and social sensitivity. It reflects the level of empathy, the ability to show emotion and compassion, and also how selflessly and devotionally one can commit.<\/li>\n
The faculty to be attentive in the Now, with a large span of focus. It reflects the level of self-reflective attention one can bring forth and the ability to integrate inner attention to ourselves with external attention to the situation we are in. It reflects our ability to be inwardly still and transcend ego conditioning.<\/li>\n
To avoid confusion with the regular IQ, we call this the NQ (Noetic<\/span><\/span> Quotient). It is the faculty for intuitive perception\u2014the ability to arrive at insights without explicit reasoning or facts. It stands for an \u2018inner knowing\u2019 and for picking up non-rational signals, often based on experience and unconscious information processing (subsidiary<\/em> consciousness). This ability also arises from information coming from the subtle senses<\/em><\/span><\/span>. Premonitions and revelations also fall under this.<\/li>\n
The faculty to use language in a creative, precise, and expressive way, important for idea processing and in communication and rhetoric. LQ includes both verbal and written skills, the creation of clear descriptions, metaphors, and the development of new words or concepts (including through bisociation<\/em>).
Due to linguistic relativity<\/em>\u2014which means that the language we have learned and permanently use influences our thinking and thus our perception of reality\u2014we should not underestimate LQ.<\/li>\n
The faculty for causal thinking, to recognize cause-effect relationships, which also structures reasoning. This quotient reinforces rational thinking (RQ) and is important in analytical, scientific, and spiritual processes. It stands for the ability to understand things in and outside ourselves, to derive and learn from them, including the insight to understand these conclusions more deeply.<\/li>\n
The faculty to combine spatial and physical insight with motor control. This includes body awareness, motor memory, and the sensing of spatial structures\/conditions\u2014recognizable in architects, visual artists, musicians, and athletes.<\/li>\n
The faculty to sense, understand, and apply tonal structures, rhythms, harmonies, and compositions. It includes the ability of inner hearing. The MQ functions not only in performing and composing musicians but also in listeners and dancers. We are speaking of a strong rhythmic and auditory awareness.<\/li>\nFocal and Subsidiary Awareness: The Hidden Dynamics of Intelligence<\/h3>\n
\n
Crystallized and Fluid Intelligence and Bisociation<\/h3>\n
\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.zelfkennis.nu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/verginaster-nieuw-200.svg\")
<\/p>\nExample of Musical Improvisation<\/h4>\n
Free improvisation originates from creativity and is always \u2018new\u2019. Without creativity (CQ), an improvisation would deteriorate into a display of previously acquired motor skills, crystallinely<\/em> driven.<\/span>
Because music only truly becomes music when it is played with feeling, the improvisation is also powered by emotional capacities (EQ). This feeling aspect plays an essential role in achieving depth.<\/span>
During an improvisation with other musicians, in an optimal situation, even more Q\u2019s are involved, such as social interaction (SQ), which leads to even more aspects of intelligence influencing one another. The Venn diagram shows how a multitude of overlapping influences arises when four Q\u2019s interact.<\/span><\/p>\n
Motor skill, of course, has been acquired through a certain kinesthetic ability (KQ).<\/span><\/p>\n
![\"Venn](\"https:\/\/www.zelfkennis.nu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/venndiagram-4xQ-muziekimpro.jpg\")
<\/a>If, in addition, a higher-level self-reflection on one\u2019s own performance opens up through our Observer (AQ) \u2014 a neutral awareness of the action, the emotion, and the actions of the music collective \u2014 then increasingly fluid<\/em> intelligence will take the lead during the improvisation. This creates an optimal situation in which, within the improvisation, no limits are exceeded in any area.<\/span><\/p>\n